Comments on: Welcome to Web 3.0

By: D7 Ushers in Web 3.0 Era

D7 Ushers in Web 3.0 Era — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:59:07 +0000

[...] night, in Carlsbad, Calif., D7 Conference organizers Walt Mossberg and Kara Swisher declared: “The Web 2.0 era over.” Hell, [...]

By: Social Technology Solutions for Business « Company Net – Experts in Microsoft

Sun, 13 Sep 2009 07:26:14 +0000

[...] collaborative applications, typically labeled as “Web 2.0″ technologies or even “Web 3.0” by some. The use of forums, wikis and blogs is seen as a cheaper way of marketing products [...]

By: Spoiled Milk ApS > Blog » The rise and fall of Web 3.0

Spoiled Milk ApS > Blog » The rise and fall of Web 3.0 — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 06:31:24 +0000

[...] Walt Mossberg held their D: All Things Digital conference. In their associated article named “Welcome to Web 3.0” Swisher and Mossberg defined the Web 3.0 as “the real arrival, after years of false [...]

By: Carlton Northern

Carlton Northern — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:02:22 +0000

You guys are just dead wrong. How can you call mobile computing web 3.0? There completely separate topics.

Web 3.0 is, unlike its predecessors (a web of linked documents), a web of linked data. A web where the conceptual and semantic understanding of its content is just as important as its presentation. This idea is still in its infancy, but shouldnt Web 3.0 be something that is new, rather than something that we’ve been doing for the past few years?

By: Gelato… and technology? « CaféMia Blog

Gelato… and technology? « CaféMia Blog — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:32:35 +0000

[...] the dawn of Web 3.0 or 2010 Web– whatever you want to call it. It’s on. It’s everywhere. Hopefully [...]

By: Stan Wiechers

Stan Wiechers — Sat, 30 May 2009 16:31:48 +0000

There is a general misunderstanding of the importance of iPhone apps. Apps are useful no doubt, but the hype lets us overlook the fact that the most used app on a iPhone is the web browser (besides sms/mail). Same as on the desktop. And the best way to find information that leads to websites is google. Same as on the desktop. This matters most not 3rd party apps. Its the mobile web.

By: Colin Henderson

Colin Henderson — Sat, 30 May 2009 04:28:50 +0000

If you insist on going down this road, 2.5 is the most you get. 3.0 has to be a sea shift – secure identities shared across the 2.0 landscape for example.

By: Bill Ingle

Bill Ingle — Fri, 29 May 2009 16:22:31 +0000

1. Who is to say whether all but a few newspaper entities — including one or two quality papers and a number of tiny, local, and “free” (advertising supported) papers — will survive a continuing structural meltdown?

You may end up with ad hoc collections of professionals paid directly by readers — using the web, of course — either in advance or after-the-fact.

The “digital revolution” is of course a major factor in the meltdown, but it can also be seen as an external symbol for something else, something off all present official radar screens.

2. How can an event called “All Things Digital” exclude machine-to-machine (M2M)? (See http://www.beechamresearch.com .)

3. The statement “…comment is free but facts are sacred” appeared in a 1921 essay on journalism. This site:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree followed, many years later.

Here anyone is free to contribute up to 5,000 characters per comment on a vast assortment of constantly changing topics.

(Of course the author of the 1921 essay never imagined such a reality.)

PS. The layout of the legends in relation to the three entry fields is mildly confusing.

By: Tom Kasperski

Tom Kasperski — Fri, 29 May 2009 15:11:28 +0000

Have we reached the crescendo of the sillynamealypse yet?

By: Counsel Dew

Counsel Dew — Fri, 29 May 2009 12:27:43 +0000

Web 3.0 is not an accurate description, but it did get you page hits…

Sad day when we need to “create” hype to get hits rather than just report on news… I hope you have better standards moving forward than the major news media companies…

(Page isn’t displaying well on Firefox–form isn’t “lined up well”)